GasCope
CFTC Decides Crypto Custody Looks Fun, Announces Full接管 of $3T Industry
Back to feed

CFTC Decides Crypto Custody Looks Fun, Announces Full接管 of $3T Industry

Michael Selig, Donald Trump's handpicked sheriff for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has announced his agency is totally ready to be the crypto industry's new regulatory mommy. No pressure on Congress or anything—we're sure the legislators are thrilled to hand over a $3 trillion industry to an agency that just learned what a blockchain is.

In a statement covering his first 100 days, Selig made it crystal clear the CFTC is "ready to take responsibility" for both crypto and prediction markets. Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act—that bipartisan crypto market structure bill we've been hearing about for what feels like three bear markets—continues gathering dust in the Senate, stuck in an eternal debate about stablecoin yield and other riveting legislative distractions.

"The same regulatory clarity being delivered to the crypto industry is being developed for prediction markets," Selig said, because apparently the CFTC decided why regulate one complex emerging market when you can flex on two? Ambitious, we'll give them that.

Since his Senate confirmation in December, Selig has made it abundantly clear the CFTC will take a friendlier approach to digital asset enforcement compared to previous administrations. In March, the CFTC and SEC even signed a memo of understanding to coordinate on regulatory matters, including digital assets. You know, the two agencies that spent years fighting over whose playground crypto belonged in, now holding hands and singing kumbaya.

Related: Crypto exchange KuCoin agrees to $500K settlement, ending CFTC case

As for prediction markets, state authorities and federal lawmakers have been circling platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket like sharks who just discovered insider trading is technically legal in their jurisdiction. The allegations include gaming law violations and accusations that politicians have been trading on insider information. Revolutionary concept, we know—elected officials possibly using non-public government info to make money. Never heard of that before.

The CFTC, however, insists it has "exclusive jurisdiction" over prediction markets. Enforcement director David Miller recently clarified that event contracts are "swaps," not "gaming," which probably won't surprise anyone who thought "swap" was just what you called crypto trades before DeFi made it sound technical. Apparently calling something a "swap" makes all the CFTC jurisdictional questions disappear like a promising airdrop.

Some lawmakers are pushing legislation to ban elected officials from profiting off event contracts after suspicious trades involving military actions in Iran and Venezuela. Because nothing screams "regulatory clarity" like Congress drafting laws while the CFTC draws battle lines with state regulators. Nothing like watching democracy work in real-time, complete with all the gridlock and confused plot twists of a prestige TV drama.

Share:
Publishergascope.com
Published
UpdatedApr 3, 2026, 07:29 UTC

Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.

See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.