Too Lazy to Fork: Schwartz Says His Only Side Hustle Is Watching His XRPL Node Chug Along
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz, Ripple CTO Emeritus and OG architect of the XRP Ledger, has officially shut down whispers of him launching his own gig. The man himself, responding to community curiosity about post-2025 plans, delivered his verdict in classic ironic fashion: he's "too lazy."
But don't mistake laziness for inactivity. Schwartz isn't exactly taking a sabbatical. He's keeping the XRPL ship steady and ensuring the existing network doesn't drift off course.
This week, Schwartz gave the community a peek at his personal XRPL node's performance metrics over 14 days—something he rarely does. The data dropped right into the middle of a heated discussion about rippled code quirks.
Turns out, there's a delightfully ironic bug lurking in the code: when two servers chill in the same data center with suspiciously low latency, the XRPL's DDoS protection gets a bit overzealous and interprets their lightning-fast chat as an attack, then promptly terminates the connection. Smooth.
Schwartz officially transitioning to CTO Emeritus status was a pretty big deal—not just for Ripple, but for crypto Twitter as a whole. With XRP hovering around $1.30 and the theoretical SEC showdown firmly in the rearview mirror, Schwartz remains the de facto guardian of whether XRPL behaves as designed.
His decision to stay put rather than spin off a solo venture is being read as a green light for investors. The main architect isn't about to fragment liquidity or spread market attention thin. He's sticking with the architecture he's been perfecting for over a decade.
Some might call it commitment. Schwartz calls it laziness. We'll take it.
Mentioned Coins
Share Article
Quick Info
Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.
See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.