GasCope
Bessent Dubs Crypto Critics 'Nihilists' as Clarity Act Stalls (Again) Over Stablecoin Squabbles
Back to feed

Bessent Dubs Crypto Critics 'Nihilists' as Clarity Act Stalls (Again) Over Stablecoin Squabbles

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday absolutely torched crypto leaders who won't get behind the stalled Clarity Act, calling them "nihilists" who need to be defeated so development can come crawling back to American soil. Apparently wanting regulatory clarity makes you a radical now. Bessent dropped this spicy take in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, because nothing says "we're taking crypto seriously" like an op-ed during a Wednesday afternoon.

"A growing share of crypto development relocated to places with clear rules, such as Abu Dhabi and Singapore," Bessent wrote. "Though industry nihilists may argue otherwise, there is one way to give developers and entrepreneurs the comfort to reshore: durable law." Cool, Scott. Very helpful. Just casually telling builders to abandon their beach lifestyle and five-figure office rents for the privilege of regulatory clarity in Delaware. Revolutionary take, Secretary.

The Clarity Act—a market structure bill designed to formally legalize most crypto activity—remains absolutely wrecked in the Senate. While Senate Republicans are still planning a long-delayed vote this month, a key dispute continues to block progress. Remember when we thought this would pass last summer? That was cute. We're now in "one more deadline" territory, which in crypto legislative terms means we're basically in a permanent state of Schrodinger's Bill.

At the heart of the stalemate: whether stablecoin issuers should pay yield to customers. Crypto companies want it; banks don't. Both sides have been going back and forth for months trying to find middle ground. It's like watching two people argue over a blanket while the room burns down. Banks want stablecoins to be boring savings accounts without the fun parts, while crypto companies want to actually compete with TradFi. Groundbreaking conflict here.

Back in January, Coinbase pulled its support over language the banking lobby pushed that could have restricted stablecoin yield programs. A bipartisan compromise surfaced last month, but Coinbase still wasn't happy with it. Now there's a revised proposal floating around—but that's upset the banking industry instead. So we've gone from bad proposal to slightly less bad proposal to a new proposal that everyone hates equally. The legislative equivalent of swapping seat positions on the Titanic.

"We continue to offer our constructive ideas for tightening the yield prohibition because of the real risks to lending and economic growth," a banking industry source said. Ah yes, the "real risks to economic growth

Share:
Publishergascope.com
Published
UpdatedApr 11, 2026, 22:27 UTC

Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.

See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.