Bitcoin Can't Catch a Break: Whales Dump, Trump Threatens Hormuz Blockade, and Justin Sun Discovers WLFI's 'Backdoor' Surprise
Bitcoin took another hit this week as geopolitical tensions and relentless whale selling kept the price under pressure. The first round of Iran peace negotiations went sideways over the weekend—Vice President JD Vance walked out Saturday night without a deal. Trump responded almost immediately, posting that the U.S. Navy would begin "BLOCKADING anyand all ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz—effective immediately." Markets reacted poorly. BTC tumbled from the $73K+ level down to $71K. ETH slipped from above $2,300 to below $2,200. Oil spiked 7% and climbed back to $97, raising fresh concerns about the economic impact of a potential blockade. Because nothing says "bull market" like geopolitical brinkmanship in one of the world's busiest oil chokepoints.
But war volatility isn't the only headwind. New data from Glassnode reveals Bitcoin is facing $20 million in profit realization per hour above the $70K level, as large holders become relentless sellers. Breaking through $80K looks like it'll remain a battle for the foreseeable future. The whales aren't just selling—they're practically doing a fire sale while making eye contact with you.
On the institutional front, Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF, MSBT, launched last week, and the financial giant is already mapping what comes next. The firm's digital-asset strategy head Amy Oldenburg told Decrypt the firm sees a tokenized money-market fund as "definitely a path forward," following BlackRock's BUIDL ($2.3B) into yield-bearing tokens. Parametric, a Morgan Stanley subsidiary, would handle crypto tax-loss harvesting. Bitcoin yield and lending services are being built in-house—"We can't just primarily rent the technology," Oldenburg said in February. Nothing says "we're serious about crypto" like building your own yield infrastructure instead of just renting it from some degen startup.
The debut of Morgan Stanley's spot Bitcoin ETF marked a major milestone for the investment bank with $9.3 trillion in client assets. The firm filed applications in January for exchange-traded funds tracking Ethereum and Solana, and Oldenburg suggested the company won't stop there. With $9.3 trillion in AUM, Morgan Stanley deciding to go full crypto is like watching a whale finally decide to dip its toe in the pool—except the pool is on fire and everyone is cheering.
In quantum news, StarkWare researcher Avihu Mordechai Levy published a proposal that could make Bitcoin quantum-resistant without requiring a soft fork. His QSB scheme uses hash-based puzzles and Lamport signatures within Bitcoin's existing scripting rules. Users solve a roughly 70 trillion attempt puzzle off-chain (GPU-solvable for a few hundred dollars), then broadcast a transaction already containing proof. No fork needed—but there's a catch. Transactions would be non-standard and go directly to mining pools, Grover's algorithm threat remains, and it's expensive and won't scale well. Levy acknowledges this is a workaround, not a permanent fix. It's like putting a padlock on your front door while the quantum computers are already in the house, but hey, at least you're trying.
The regulatory battle over prediction markets continues escalating. CFTC Chair Mike Selig told CoinDesk at Vanderbilt's Digital Assets Summit that the agency will continue defending its "exclusive regulatory authority" over prediction markets in court, regardless of the underlying event. "It doesn't matter if it's sports, politics, or anything else. If it's a validly offered product on a CFTC-regulated exchange, we regulate that." The CFTC really said "yes, we're going to regulate your Polymarket bets about whether humanity survives the next four years."
The Justice Department and CFTC jointly filed lawsuits Thursday against Illinois, Arizona, and Connecticut, coming to the aid of prediction markets. The Trump administration argues the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction to regulate sports-related wagers on platforms including Polymarket and Kalshi. The Third Circuit ruled April 6 that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over trades on designated contract markets. The Ninth Circuit, which includes Nevada, hears a consolidated case next week. Selig warned Nevada won't be the last state targeted. The regulatory rabbit hole just keeps getting deeper—next up, probably Wyoming and then Antarctica.
Meanwhile, Justin Sun—who invested $75 million in World Liberty Financial last year—went off on X this Sunday, alleging WLFI embedded a "backdoor blacklisting function" in the smart contract used to deploy WLFI tokens. "What was never disclosed—to me or to any investor—is that World Liberty embedded a backdoor blacklisting function in the smart contract used to deploy WLFI tokens. This function gives the company unilateral power to freeze, restrict, and effectively confiscate the property rights of any token holder, without notice, without cause, and without recourse." Nothing says "financial revolution" like a smart contract with a kill switch that makesbanks look like amateurs.
Sun's comments came after WLFI deposited 5 billion WLFI tokens as collateral on Dolomite, a DeFi protocol co-founded by a WLFI adviser, and borrowed $75 million in stablecoins—a move that went viral with many claiming the WLFI team is selling out without actually selling. Sun ended his post calling on the team to unlock the remaining tokens and uphold transparency for the community. The WLFI team responded late Sunday, stating they have the evidence and are ready to see Justin Sun in court. And there you have it—Justin Sun, the man who once paid $4.5 million to have lunch with Warren Buffett, is now suing his own investment. The drama never stops.
Mentioned Coins
Share Article
Quick Info
Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.
See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.