HODLing Until 2030: World Liberty Unveils Vesting Schedule That Outlasts Trump's Entire Term
World Liberty Financial has proposed a token vesting schedule that would keep $1.3 billion worth of WLFI locked up well beyond Donald Trump's second term, leaving early investors less than thrilled about their long-term commitment. Apparently, "HODL" now stands for "Hands Off Due to Legal Imprisonment."
The governance proposal, published Wednesday, outlines a four-year unlock pathway for 17 billion WLFI allocated to early supporters. The schedule includes a two-year cliff followed by two years of gradual vesting once enacted. Think of it as a crypto time capsule, except you're the one trapped inside.
That's still shorter than the terms offered to World Liberty's founders, team members, advisors, and partners, who would unlock 40 billion WLFI over five years. That group also gets 4.5 billion tokens burned. Apparently, insiders wanted to prove they have skin in the game, but only after everyone else is locked in the dungeon.
World Liberty frames the unlock structure as designed in a "measured, predictable way that the broader market can anticipate," with the voluntary token burn serving as an on-chain conviction signal from insiders. Nothing says "we're in this together" like a five-year lockup while the founders get a slightly shorter sentence.
The proposal arrives after the team faced scrutiny for borrowing $75 million in stablecoins from Dolomite—a DeFi protocol co-founded by a World Liberty advisor—using 5 billion WLFI as collateral. It's like borrowing money from your roommate, except your roommate is also your financial advisor and the couch cushions are 5 billion tokens.
Investors on the project's governance forum were caught off guard, especially given the project started accepting funds in October 2024, roughly 550 days ago. That's roughly 18 months of DCA'ing into a project, only to find out you're just getting started. Ouch.
"WTF," one user wrote. "So, after a full three years, we're finally getting our next token distribution." Another wasn't as diplomatic: "I'm going to put these bastards in jail." Yikes. That investor definitely didn't read the whitepaper. Or maybe they did and that's exactly why they're upset.
Justin Sun, the Tron founder and controversial crypto entrepreneur, called the proposal "tyranny" in an X post. He argues the vote is rigged because it punishes dissenting WLFI holders, excludes large holders like himself, and can be overwritten by those controlling World Liberty's anonymous smart contracts—all while investors had to disclose personal information. Coming from Justin Sun, being called tyrannical is honestly a badge of honor. The man knows tyranny when he sees it.
"This proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation," Sun declared. You almost feel bad for these guys. They just wanted to build a decentralized future where nobody controls anything. Turns out they meant nobody controls them, specifically.
Investors from last year's $550 million public sale previously had no clarity on when they'd access their WLFI. When tokens went live in September, early supporters received 20% of their holdings at $0.23 per token, according to CoinGecko. So they got a taste of freedom, like a parole hearing, but the parole officer keeps pushing back the date.
WLFI now trades around $0.08, down 65% from launch and near the all-time low set last week. At this rate, the only thing vesting faster than their tokens is their price.
Despite the plunge, early presale participants who bought at $0.015 to $0.05 are likely still in profit—with 80% of their tokens still locked, for now. On paper, they're winning
Mentioned Coins
Share Article
Quick Info
Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.
See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.