GasCope
What Could Happen if Bitcoin Breaks Below $60,000
Back to feed

What Could Happen if Bitcoin Breaks Below $60,000

By our Markets Desk3 min read

Bitcoin's slide toward $60,000 has placed the market at a critical structural crossroads. The level serves as a primary cost basis for institutions and a key strike for derivatives hedging. A decisive break lower could trigger mechanical selling, potentially deepening the selloff.

Bitcoin (BTC $60,238.80) continues to lose ground, with the price closing in on $60,000 amid record ETF outflows. The $60,000 mark has been widely cited by analysts as a major support level — below which the selloff could get even uglier. Round numbers are arbitrary, of course, but markets rarely get that memo.

Jean-David Péquignot, chief commercial officer at crypto options exchange Deribit, said the price is critical not just because it's a round-number psychological level. More importantly, it's a structural threshold with real consequences for institutions and derivatives market participants.

The cost basis problem

According to Péquignot, a significant chunk of institutional money — comprising ETF buyers, large holders, and short-term speculators — bought bitcoin at prices between $60,000 and $67,000 over the past year. With the largest cryptocurrency now trading within that range, these buyers are sitting at or near their cost basis, essentially at break-even. If prices drop further, unrealized or paper losses will mount, and holding becomes expensive — especially when AI stocks and other corners of the traditional market are rallying like there is no tomorrow.

"As price undercuts their cost basis, the resulting unrealized losses may incentivize rushed selling, especially as the opportunity cost of holding BTC rises against a surging AI equity sector," he said.

Michael Saylor, the high-profile executive chairman of Strategy (MSTR), the largest publicly traded bitcoin holder, also blamed capital rotation for recent BTC losses.

The derivatives problem

Things turn mechanical after that. On Deribit, there is over $1.2 billion in notional open interest sitting at the $60,000 strike put options, which pay out if prices fall below that level. Investors have bought these as a hedge against a protracted selloff. The problem, however, is that market makers, who are on the opposite side of the trade, are now short puts — or more precisely, "short gamma." As BTC nears $60,000, market makers and dealers will be forced to sell spot BTC or futures to balance their books. Other things being equal, this hedging can accelerate the selloff, turning an orderly decline into a chaotic one, Péquignot said.

He also pointed out that there are too many leveraged longs in the system, and a break below $60,000 could lead to more liquidations, adding to downside momentum.

"With leverage still not fully flushed from the system, a break of $60K could rapidly worsen collateral metrics, triggering a cascading wave of automated long liquidations," he said.

Note that billions of dollars of leveraged longs — or bullish plays tied to BTC and other tokens — have already been liquidated this week.

More For You: Why diehard bitcoin purists aren't sweating the massive price crash that wiped out $200 billion — By Olivier Acuna | Edited by Aoyon Ashraf, 35 minutes ago. Mati Greenspan, Michael Saylor, and Jameson Lopp blamed the AI boom for draining capital from bitcoin. Meanwhile, Jack Mallers refrained from sharing an outlook but recommended buying the dip. What to know: Bitcoin maximalists argue the recent price slump is a temporary liquidity crunch driven by speculative capital rotating into artificial intelligence rather than a loss of faith in the asset. Analysts point to record outflows fr

Mentioned Coins

$BTC
Share:
Publishergascope.com
Published
CategoryMarkets

Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.

See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.