GasCope
Need something max 12 words. Maybe: "From $255M to $13.7B in 6 Quarters: Aschenbrenner's AI Infrastructure Bet" That's 11 words. Good.
Back to feed

Need something max 12 words. Maybe: "From $255M to $13.7B in 6 Quarters: Aschenbrenner's AI Infrastructure Bet" That's 11 words. Good.

By our Markets Desk11 min read

Leopold Aschenbrenner just took Situational Awareness LP from $255M to $13.7B in only six quarters. His Q1 2026 filing dropped, and one new move stands out as especially sharp. Full breakdown of what he's doing with AI infrastructure stocks here 👇

The following guest post comes from BitcoinMiningStock.io, a public markets intelligence platform delivering data on companies exposed to bitcoin mining, artificial intelligence, and crypto treasury strategies. Originally published on May 26, 2026, by Cindy Feng.

Key Takeaways:

  • Leopold Aschenbrenner grew Situational Awareness LP from $255M to $13.7B in 6 quarters.
  • Q1 2026 added $8.5B in SMH, Nvidia and AMD puts, signaling caution across AI chips.
  • CleanSpark rose 7x in holdings; Aug. 2026 filings may reveal Aschenbrenner's next move.

I was not aware of Situational Awareness LP until recently. Earlier last week, CleanSpark rallied while the majority of bitcoin-mining peers were trading in the red. The speculation on X attributed the move to Leopold Aschenbrenner increasing his position significantly in the latest 13F. That got me curious enough to read the filing properly. What I found turned out to be more interesting than the CleanSpark speculation.

Who Leopold Aschenbrenner is, and what Situational Awareness is

When Leopold Aschenbrenner published Situational Awareness in mid-2024, the 165-page essay argued that artificial general intelligence was much closer than the public consensus believed, that compute and power infrastructure would be the binding constraint, and that the buildout to support it would be the defining investment story of the late 2020s. He launched a hedge fund of the same name shortly after. Six 13F filings later, Situational Awareness LP is read religiously by a meaningful slice of AI investors. The fund gets called the Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure, though the track record is short, just six quarters, and it has never been tested in a real drawdown. Should you copy his trades? That is a good question. Let me take a close look.

Six quarters of growth

Situational Awareness LP first appeared on the 13F radar in late 2024 with a small $255M book. It has grown almost every quarter since. The fund crossed $1B in Q1 2025 and $5B in Q4 2025. Q1 2026 is the biggest jump yet, more than doubling to $13.7B. But the long stock plus call portion of the book barely moved (from $5.5B to $5.2B). The entire growth in reported 13F notional is a brand-new $8.5B put-option book on the semiconductor complex. Notably, in five previous quarters Aschenbrenner had no meaningful put exposure at all (just a $9M Infosys put in Q4 2025). Q1 2026 is the first time he is filing a real options book.

What the Q1 2026 book actually looks like

Here are the largest reported positions, color-coded by type. Blue is long common stock, green is call options, red is put options. The single biggest line in the entire fund is no longer a stock pick, it is a $2.04B put on the VanEck Semi ETF (SMH). Five of the next six lines are also puts (NVDA, ORCL, AVGO, AMD, MU). The largest bullish position is Bloom Energy at $879M of common stock, with CoreWeave and SanDisk close behind.

A few details to flag.

NVDA is a brand-new position: a $1.57B put on 8.99 million shares with no offsetting long. Oracle, Broadcom, AMD, and ASML are also fresh puts of roughly $0.5B to $1B each. Micron and Taiwan Semi carry three-legged structures (put, call, and a small long on the same name), which looks less directional and more like long-volatility positioning. Intel went the other way: Q4 held a $747M bullish call on 20 million shares, Q1 holds a $159M put and a 202K-share residual long. Same name, opposite position, in a quarter's time.

Reading the put overlay

This is the part of the filing that deserves the most attention, because the natural reading could be that Aschenbrenner turned bearish on the AI semi complex. Is that the case though? There are eleven names where the fund owns puts. On nine of them, the put exposure dwarfs any o

Wait, the article is cut off. I need to preserve that cutoff or end gracefully. Let me end at the cutoff point as it appears, since I can't invent content. The user said do NOT add external knowledge or invented quotes.

Let me add some light humor naturally. The "Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure" comparison is a good spot for dry humor. Also the 7x CleanSpark rise and the put overlay could use a touch.

Let me refine:

For the Cathie Wood line: "The fund gets called the Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure, though the track record is short, just six quarters, and it has never been tested in a real drawdown." - I can add a bit of dry observation.

Let me try: "The fund gets called the Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure, which is either a compliment or a warning depending on your feelings about leveraged innovation ETFs. The track record is short, just six quarters, and it has never been tested in a real drawdown."

Hmm, that might be too much. Let me keep it subtle.

For the Q1 2026 put book line: "The entire growth in reported 13F notional is a brand-new $8.5B put-option book on the semiconductor complex." - could add "because nothing says AI optimism like $8.5B in puts."

That's a bit forced. Let me be more subtle.

For CleanSpark: "CleanSpark rose 7x in holdings" - just fact, leave alone.

For "Should you copy his trades?" - good spot for dry humor: "Should you copy his trades? That is a good question. Asking for a friend. Let me take a close look."

Let me draft the full article with subtle dry humor:

Para 1: Good, punchy. The "one new move stands out as especially sharp" is good. "Full breakdown of what he's doing with AI infrastructure stocks here 👇" is fine.

Para 4: "That got me curious enough to read the filing properly. What I found turned out to be more interesting than the CleanSpark speculation." Good.

Para 6-7: "When Leopold Aschenbrenner published Situational Awareness in mid-2024, the 165-page essay..." - need to fix the original which had a period after "mid-2024" then "The 165-page essay..." I'll combine it.

Let me finalize:

Actually for the "Reading the put overlay" para, I can add a small touch: "This is the part of the filing that deserves the most attention, because the natural reading could be that Aschenbrenner turned bearish on the AI semi complex."

The humor could be: "...turned bearish on the very complex his entire fund is named after." Wait, the fund is named "Situational Awareness" not "AI semi complex." Skip that.

Or: "Reading the put overlay. This is the part of the filing that deserves the most attention, because the natural reading could be that Aschenbrenner turned bearish on the AI semi complex. Is that the case though? Either way, the hedgies are watching."

Hmm. Let me just keep things clean with very light touches.

Final draft:

TITLE: From $255M to $13.7B in 6 Quarters: Aschenbrenner's AI Infrastructure Bet

ARTICLE: Leopold Aschenbrenner just took Situational Awareness LP from $255M to $13.7B in only six quarters. His Q1 2026 filing dropped, and one new move stands out as especially sharp. Full breakdown of what he's doing with AI infrastructure stocks here 👇

The following guest post comes from BitcoinMiningStock.io, a public markets intelligence platform delivering data on companies exposed to bitcoin mining, artificial intelligence, and crypto treasury strategies. Originally published on May 26, 2026, by Cindy Feng.

Key Takeaways:

  • Leopold Aschenbrenner grew Situational Awareness LP from $255M to $13.7B in 6 quarters.
  • Q1 2026 added $8.5B in SMH, Nvidia and AMD puts, signaling caution across AI chips.
  • CleanSpark rose 7x in holdings; Aug. 2026 filings may reveal Aschenbrenner's next move.

I was not aware of Situational Awareness LP until recently. Earlier last week, CleanSpark rallied while the majority of bitcoin-mining peers were trading in the red. The speculation on X attributed the move to Leopold Aschenbrenner increasing his position significantly in the latest 13F. That got me curious enough to read the filing properly. What I found turned out to be more interesting than the CleanSpark speculation.

Who Leopold Aschenbrenner is, and what Situational Awareness is

When Leopold Aschenbrenner published Situational Awareness in mid-2024, the 165-page essay argued that artificial general intelligence was much closer than the public consensus believed, that compute and power infrastructure would be the binding constraint, and that the buildout to support it would be the defining investment story of the late 2020s. He launched a hedge fund of the same name shortly after. Six 13F filings later, Situational Awareness LP is read religiously by a meaningful slice of AI investors. The fund gets called the Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure, which is either flattering or a cautionary tale depending on your tolerance for ARK-style volatility. The track record is short, just six quarters, and it has never been tested in a real drawdown. Should you copy his trades? That is a good question. Let me take a close look.

Six quarters of growth

Situational Awareness LP first appeared on the 13F radar in late 2024 with a small $255M book. It has grown almost every quarter since. The fund crossed $1B in Q1 2025 and $5B in Q4 2025. Q1 2026 is the biggest jump yet, more than doubling to $13.7B. But the long stock plus call portion of the book barely moved (from $5.5B to $5.2B). The entire growth in reported 13F notional is a brand-new $8.5B put-option book on the semiconductor complex. Notably, in five previous quarters Aschenbrenner had no meaningful put exposure at all (just a $9M Infosys put in Q4 2025). Q1 2026 is the first time he is filing a real options book.

What the Q1 2026 book actually looks like

Here are the largest reported positions, color-coded by type. Blue is long common stock, green is call options, red is put options. The single biggest line in the entire fund is no longer a stock pick, it is a $2.04B put on the VanEck Semi ETF (SMH). Five of the next six lines are also puts (NVDA, ORCL, AVGO, AMD, MU). The largest bullish position is Bloom Energy at $879M of common stock, with CoreWeave and SanDisk close behind.

A few details to flag.

NVDA is a brand-new position: a $1.57B put on 8.99 million shares with no offsetting long. Oracle, Broadcom, AMD, and ASML are also fresh puts of roughly $0.5B to $1B each. Micron and Taiwan Semi carry three-legged structures (put, call, and a small long on the same name), which looks less directional and more like long-volatility positioning. Intel went the other way: Q4 held a $747M bullish call on 20 million shares, Q1 holds a $159M put and a 202K-share residual long. Same name, opposite position, in a quarter's time.

Reading the put overlay

This is the part of the filing that deserves the most attention, because the natural reading could be that Aschenbrenner turned bearish on the AI semi complex. Is that the case though? There are eleven names where the fund owns puts. On nine of them, the put exposure dwarfs any o

Wait, I need to check word count for the title: "From $255M to $13.7B in 6 Quarters: Aschenbrenner's AI Infrastructure Bet" - that's 10-11 words. Good.

The humor in "ARK-style volatility" might be too insider. Let me adjust to: "The fund gets called the Cathie Wood of AI infrastructure, which is either flattering or a warning sign depending on how you feel about thematic ETFs."

Actually keep it simple. The "ARK-style volatility" is pretty crypto-native. Or just say "thematic ETFs."

Let me also check the "brand-new" hyphenation - should be "brand new" in American English without hyphen. I'll keep "brand new" without hyphen.

Looking back at original: "The entire growth in reported 13F notional is a brand new $8.5B put-option book" - the original has "brand new" without hyphen. I had "brand-new" - let me match the original style or use standard. The polish rules don't require changing it. I'll use "brand-new" since it's a compound modifier before a noun. Actually the original doesn't hyphen

Mentioned Coins

$BTC
Share:
Publishergascope.com
Published
CategoryMarkets

Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.

See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.